Erik Veland // words.

Erik Veland // words.

Erik Veland  //  Producer of the highest quality product

Apr 1 / 3:31pm

Twitter — a retro/introspective

Yesterday was a strange #BTUB for me. And I have attended a few.

Firstly I was confronted by something I have never considered nor wanted: fame. My girlfriend Francesca have often teased me about it, casually palmed it off to her friends when explaining twitter to her friends. And I have always laughed it off with a "no, I'm not."

Yet, to my face, in a radio interview, last night I was presented as a "twitter celebrity". How'd you figure that, I asked? "Followers" was the reply. "You have lots of followers."

Now that struck me as an odd answer. Lots of people follow lots of people on Twitter. You can get followers all sorts of ways. If you follow enough people, you'll get an almost equal amount following you back.

But that is not what I would call a measurement of fame. Even by the very limited context of twitter. I am very selective with whom I follow on twitter. Over the years I have pretty much strictly limited myself to local people that I can talk to, and are interesting to me.

My follower base has thusly been slow to grow, and I feel that my number of followers (around 1800) is only a factor of the time (almost three years) and effort I've put in to twitter.

So already my "fame" is quite limited: one, it is on a rather limited medium to start with. Two, it is strictly local - in a geographical sense. And three, a measurement of fame based on followers is already a rather shallow measure. There are people with more followers. Peter Black (@peterjblack) and Brady (@pressdarling) for example enjoy similar statuses of "local twitter celebrities". And there are people with more followers yet again who doesn't.

Now that got me thinking. Am I a celebrity (again - in this limited context)? I still wouldn't say so. Twitter is a strange beast. It is, for me, a very local forum of lots of people I care about and share my (often highly opinionated) views with. I throw things into the ether, hoping that someone will enjoy it: be it a link, a witticisms or an opinion. But most of all it is about the very real and tangible relationships I have cultivated over the years.

I love meeting new people. And through twitter I've met a lot. And through twitter the largest share of whom I call friends come from. And that's what twitter is for me. Not the number of people that sometimes glance at what I have to say.

But the people I meet, the people I talk to. In person as well as online. These days, for me, #BTUB is mostly to catch up with people that I consider friends. If there's new people there it's a bonus.

And so, being confronted with this unwanted label of celebrity, and admittedly a little bit drunk, I became very emotionally bare. I went around and told my friends how much I appreciated them. I patched up a friendship that had gone astray. And hopefully showed the new people I met that I am a real person. And not always this (slightly arrogant) internet persona that some may label a "celebrity".

Warning: it's going to get mushy from here. 

So friends of twitter and in real life. I really do appreciate you, and I am thankful to twitter for enabling me to meet you. James, Sarah, Adam, Nicole, Brady, Denis, Divna, Paul, Elspeth, Paige, Joss, Ash: You are true friends. To Samantha and Kieran: it was lovely to meet you, and you better be coming to BBQ on Sunday. To everyone else I've missed (Caspian, Chris, Netti - you are awesome): I like you too. Let's talk more. And even to the people who don't like me: hey, it's the internet. You can't like everybody.

If you've read this whole rant: Thank you too. If you haven't met me yet, come and talk to me at BTUB or come to one of my BBQs. I'd love to meet you.

Mar 5 / 9:39pm

Do you want to buy my DVD collection?

The iron giant
Garden state
Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind
Super troopers
Logan's run
Arj Barker live
The city of lost children
2010
Toy story
Toy story 2
The castle
Shawshank redemption
Ice age 2
Glen or 

All time classics:
Zulu
Day of the triffids
The 39 steps
The man with the golden arm
A farewell to arms
To kill a mockingbird
Charade
Hideaways
The fast and the furious
Little shop of horrors

Cool Runnings
Batman
Batman returns
The host
Big Fish
Memento
Trainspotting
Plan 9 from outer space
Night of the ghouls
Bride of the monster
Finding neverland
Return if the king special extended edition

Curb your enthusiasm s1 + s6
We can be heroes
Trigger happy box set
Young ones s1 + s2

Futurama box set
Seinfeld s1, 2, 3, 4

Jun 9 / 8:09am

The PC (and Mac) is dead. Long live the Computer!

Dan Lyons think the Mac is dead after WWDC. Yeah, that sentence makes no sense to anyone. Let's examine why. First of all, in today's computing landscape, there is no Mac or PC. They are all PCs. Sure that is a very semantical distinction. But one that rings true now in 2010 now, more than ever.


A personal computer is what to us now? A desktop? A laptop? A notebook? A netbook? An iPad? A smartphone?

The truth is that it's a spectrum. Not defined by OS. But by interaction.

What is more *personal*? The more intimate, the more up close and personal you can get with the data and the closer interactions with such you can have. The closer you can get, the more personal I would argue.

The PC is no longer your desktop. Nor your laptop. Not even your netbook. It is the Internet in your hands. Your friends at a touch. Your parents faces a click away. THAT is your personal computer. And the best thing is that you won't ever have to think about it as such.

Apr 13 / 9:29pm

'Open' is not good for everything

Ah Apple. How are we hating you today? Is it your insistence on keeping Flash off the iPad thereby limiting consumer choice, even as you are championing an Open Web by removing reliance on a closed proprietary technology? Or is it your insistence on controlling your own platform by removing access to the app store for apps created by third party intermediate layers (Flash, MonoTouch, etc…), or by simply having a strict quality assurance on what gets the official Apple stamp of approval?

When is Open good?

"Open is always good! ALWAYS!” Whether you are an OS advocate, a LINUX user or simply sympathetic to the ideas of “software freedom” you probably subscribe to the argument that anything should be open and free at all times. And indeed Open is an ideal to strive towards, if only for transparency and interoperability. The web is a perfect example of what needs to be Open: It is an ubiquitous network of information that should be available to everyone everywhere at any time. Open is simply the only way such a system can work. And it is this innate need for openness that has so far curbed any attempt at locking it down or putting it under central control.

And yet Apple is being slammed for one major thing: Not allowing Flash on the iPad! Flash, the wholly proprietary part of the web completely under one company’s control: Adobe. By not allowing Flash on the iPhone/iPod/iPad devices - all 85 million of them - suddenly web developers are forced to consider using alternatives. Open, accessible, standardised, stable and in most user cases: BETTER alternatives. Relying on Flash for so long, despite it’s proprietariness, instability and recently: non-ubiquiotness only comes from the inability to keep up with change. Developers need to evolve or they die with the technologies they cling to. Technology follows the same laws as the rest of the world: Evolution and market.

When is Closed good?

“Closed can never be good! Per definition closed is bad - for everyone!” Essentially the same argument as before, but it is wrong. You see, Open - for many reasons, mostly subject to human nature - tends to gravitate towards poor quality. Poor quality experience for end users more to the point. Ever heard of the term “design by committee”? Design and development based on true democracy may sound nice, but like the political equivalent, in practice it fails miserably. The paradox here to some (mostly geeks and tinkerers) is that less control equals a higher quality experience. The analogy of a car has been used a lot: Ever opened the bonnet of a car lately to do some tinkering? Not happening. Yet cars are safer, more reliable, more efficient, more powerful and more environmentally friendly than ever before. As for the user experience? The illusion of control afforded by a manual stick shift is preferable to some, but the fact is automatic transmission is in most cases more efficient (or at least good enough) that most drivers prefer not to bother with manual.

We gravitate towards simplicity, not complexity when it comes to user experience. But simple does not mean a lesser experience (again a paradox to the ones of the aforementioned mindset). Simple enables more users to do more with less mental strain. The users are not stupid, they simply achieve a richer and more fulfilling experience. Apple, on the iPad, wants to control this experience to some extent. They need to balance this out from the sheer volume and richness of apps that every day flow into the App Store to fill the blank canvas that is an iPad. Crummy apps does not reflect well on Apple, so they need an unprecedented level of control. Is this grating for some developers and champions of “Open Everything”? Of course it is. But in the end, Apple, it’s users and yes, the developers who understands this philosophy, greatly benefits. And there are many many developers who do.

For all the claims of how Apple stifles competition, creativity and innovation the fact is I have never been in a more exciting, competitive and innovative age of technology. And I have followed it for over 20 years.

More essential reading:

  • It’s all about the framework. - A technical explanation of Apple’s decision to shut out third party frameworks by Louis Gerbarg.
  • Why Apple Changed Section 3.3.1 - A political explanation of Apple’s moves by John Gruber.
  • My iPad as a Tool - The non-geek view on why it is important for things to JUST WORK. By Markos Moulitsas.
  • Apple Against The World - “The Develop-once-run-anywhere philosophy is something that makes more sense to bean counters and development-environment vendors than it does to platform owners and discriminating users.” By Jason Snell, emerging as one of my favourite tech writers next to John Gruber.
  • The Adobe - Apple Flame War - The historical perspective, from a man who was there: Jean-Louis Gassée
Apr 1 / 8:05pm

On profoundity

Those who do not believe that the iPad will profoundly change computing had learnt nothing from history. The iPod profoundly changed how we listen to music. The iPhone profoundly changed the way we use our phones.

And yes, the Mac profoundly changed computing way back then.

Feb 13 / 3:32pm

FireFox is the new IE6

Hey everyone!

Remember the dark days of web design when everything had to accommodate at a minimum IE6. Even IE5? That meant no transparent PNGS,, odd rule exceptions and dirty stylesheets. with IE only exceptions and even JavaScript hacks.

Well, those days are back. Only now it’s our old friend and holy saviour: Firefox.  Yes, as a web developer who used to say: Mac? Safari. PC? Firefox! I can no longer recommend anyone using FIrefox anymore. For as HTML5 has more than crept upon us these past years, Mozilla in their idealistic wisdom has decided to slow the web down, rather than further it’s - ironically - open cause.

You see, Mozilla has this thing for openness, At. All. Costs. And the web so far, hasn’t been quite there yet. Because of deficiencies of HTML, a language originally only made for hyperlinked texts and very little more, we have in the last decade had to rely on one very proprietary and very closed plugin for multimedia: Adobe Flash.

Now before anyone goes and paints Adobe in the same light as say, Microsoft and Apple, let me get this one thing clear: Adobe used to be about openness. They’ve championed the open standard SVG as a format for delivering vector graphics to the web, and PDF was intended as an open universal format anyone could use. And yes, even Flash used to be up for grabs for anyone.  Some might remember Apple building in native flash support in QuickTime 4 and 5 - always a version behind, but still…

Not so much anymore. A decade later and Adobe has turned into a sluggish corporation, much to the chagrin of early supporters. Adobe actually used to be this kick ass front edge developer. I know, because I’ve been using Adobe products pretty much since version 1.0. I remember when Acrobat was introduced as Carousel with a clown juggling files for an icon (something not even noted on the Acrobat wikipedia article). It was meant as a one true file format in the days when Mac/PC compatibility was something of a dark art. I agonized that PageMaker never got anywhere and that Illustrator never quite lived up to what Aldus Freehand used to be. Don’t even get me started on FrameMaker. (Kids go: what?)

Point is, somewhere before they even usurped Macromedia, Adobe changed. They became the Microsoft, the very Scott Adamsification (read his business books that are not Dilbert comics, truly eye opening) of a company that used to be cool. They still make the defacto pixel and  vector creation and editing platforms and probably always will. It’s their legacy of de facto sluggish platforms in Flash and PDF that we have to live with now.

Big tangent over. Here we are today: Reliant on a non-open, proprietary, sluggish, buggy and non moving platform for what should have been the equivalent of an <img> tag for audio and video. Yes, Flash is everywhere. Even Apple supplies it with it’s operating system today. Microsoft does the same. True, it’s an optional (or used to be, I haven’t checked lately) install for Firefox - but most *i believe* considered it just a part of the installation process. For Windows users, an installation is black art concealed by endless Next buttons you click mindlessly anyway.

Enter HTML5. It’s what HTML should have been since 1.1. True format agnostic video and audio tags, same as img tags. All ready and open as can be. We can be free from Flash and it’s sluggish proprietariness forever (at least for 99.9% of Flash’s usage on the web . Admittedly it has some uses for animation and interactivity still). And of course Mozilla is here up front supporting it all before anyone else - in the name of usability and openness for all!

*BZZZT*

Yeah. In an ideal world. Remember the part about openness at all cost? Ironically Mozilla is keeping the web chained to it’s reliance on Flash just as it is overtaking Internet Explorer as the most widely used browser. How? By insisting that the video codec is limited ONLY to the free (as in beer) and inferior codec Ogg Theora.

Now you may have heard about Ogg if you have kept up with the very geeky and largely unchanged state of audio codecs the past decade. You know that thing that’s even geekier than keeping up with audio codecs? Keeping up with video codecs. And if you are like most people, even the word codec will have long since made you go cross-eyed and skimmed over this paragraph. Point is: NOBODY GIVES A FLYING FUCK. Most people want to just surf, watch a video and listen to an audio file and not care about what goes on in the back end.

If you have a vague idea of the many forms an image can take (and perhaps which format is better suited at some things than others), you will have an idea of what a video codec is. In short it is a format that makes video suitable for viewing. Usually by the means of compressing data. You want that video to be as small as possible to conserve limited bandwidth while ideally keeping quality high enough that you don’t notice it.

But these are the things for the people who work in back ends to worry about. Strange job titles like Web Developer, Post Production or Intern. You care only about watching the damn thing. Screw the details!

Well, Mozilla and it’s product Firefox - our previous knight in shining armour - have decided in its infinite wisdom to limit display of these newfangled simple tags  <video> and <audio> to only one format: The aforementioned OGG. Or in this case OGG Theora. Now openness is a laudable goal, no one is disputing that,  we all want everything to be open to all like some democratic, nay anarchistic, wild west for unlimited innovation and flowers and rainbows. But like anarchy - and yes, even communism, which sounds AWESOME on paper, it has serious drawbacks when put into practice.

In this case: Stifling actual innovation. I have waffled on for a long time, but this is the brass tax: Firefox is stifling web innovation, by artificially limiting multimedia use in HTML5 and prolonging our reliance on a - IRONY - proprietary plugin. The cause of vast majority of reported application crashes in Safari if you must know. (Source)

Long story short: The format war is over. The free - as in freely licensed (at least until 2016) - and qualitatively superiour H.264 is the de facto format for internet video. Yet philosophical talking points stand between actual innovation and the real realities. Mozilla: Desktop Linux will never happen. Neither will your inferiour me-too “hey, at least I’m FREEEEEEE” codecs.

I’m sure I was getting somewhere with this rant, but I’ll leave it for hard editing later for now.
Jan 27 / 3:45pm

The Big Picture

Keyboard_dock_1_20100127

This day marks the first real split between the computer as a home appliance and the computer as a professional tool.

Dec 17 / 12:07am

Album Review: Agnes Kain - Across The Ocean Grey

Agneskain-acrosstheoceangrey

AGNES CAIN - Across The Ocean Grey
(Half A Cow Records / MGM)
> Can’t get enough haunting Australian singer-songwriters whispering into your ears about travels across the world, love and loss of such? The landscape is getting pretty crowded with girls-with-guitars these days, but I believe there is room for AGNES KAIN. Actually a Sydney duo consisting of Chanelle Afford and Stefan Simunic, the latter of which also pops in to fill in some vocals here and there. After releasing their debut Keep Walking Or I’ll Kill You in 2007 they have travelled the world getting inspired by dead bodies and dogs, mountain climbing, gypsy train rides and local cocktails (granted it was a Havana Club in Havana). The music sounds familiar, a little bit Holly Throsby, a little bit Lisa Mitchell. There is acoustic guitar, piano, violins and of course the almost mandatory glockenspiel. This is not complex or terribly engaging music, but it goes down a treat. I’m keeping this one.
ERIK VELAND
Dec 17 / 12:06am

Album Review: Bondi Cigars - Universal Stew

Bondicigars-universalstew

BONDI CIGARS - Universal Stew
(Independent)
> Unashamedly middle-aged blues, evoking dank basement pubs filled with cigarette smoke. Cigar smoke even. In fact, what are blues fans doing now post the smoking ban? Now I was pondering angles to put this review in, mostly revolving around the name universal stew. Is it too lowest common denominator? Too thin? Not enough meat? The truth is this is a fairly solid offering from musicians that have been playing for longer than many of the readers have been alive. Of course if you fall into that category, this album might not be for you. Sure, the blues clichés are all there. Lyrics about heartbreak, trucks rolling across plains, hard work and cheating women. There are some odd arrangement choices and some truly woeful backup singing, and while the production could have been a bit beefier this is a stew that stands up to a second serving. Yes, I went there.
ERIK VELAND

Dec 17 / 12:05am

Album Review: Jon Allen - Dead Man's Suit

Jonallen-deadmanssuit

JON ALLEN - Dead Man’s Suit
(Monologue Records)
>The cover portrays a man without a face, Jon Allen sounds like a man without his own voice. Frequently recalling someone else. Is he Rod Stewart doing Bob Dylan? Ryan Adams singing a James Blunt song? There is a tendency in music writing to compare artists to each other. Artists hate it and it looks lazy. Yet the PR for Jon Allen seems to relish in it. The aforementioned Ryan Adams is first up, with José González second. That one I don’t hear - yes they have some similarities in that they are men and play acoustic guitars. But it doesn’t end there. Mark Knopfler, Emmylous Harris, José González (again!) and Damien Rice. And then comes the press blurbs from Uncut with even more comparisons: “Like Cat Stevens, Nick Drake.” and the BBC likens him to Paul Weller and James Taylor. Jon Allen, I ask you this: Who are you? 
ERIK VELAND